Trackbacks

• No trackbacks exist for this post.

Comments

• 5/6/2011 7:09 AM peoplenamedsmith wrote:
  it's plausible and i am sure there are plenty of people that believe this may be true. but i don't believe that a event like this could be faked and stand for a very long with out being exposed. there are too many people involved in it. Ben Franklin had a saying about to many people being involved in a secret being the cause of it ultimately being exposed.But it seems that lies and deceit seems to be the way of the democratic party and their use of the rule that the end result justifies the means. look at what the house and the senate has done while in complete control of the democrats all the lies and subversions are coming out. hopefully the American people can keep their focus on these events and reciprocate the democratic party for their pursuit of their political goals instead of minding the peoples concerns about the economy and and the country's standing in the world. their political aspirations are the primary cause of the extended recession and our still faltering economy. even now the senate is jeopardizing out country's future by continuing to pursue their political goals and not repealing their damaging legislation and excessive spending. their refusal to look at what they have been doing going all the way back to 2006 and not realizing that our problems rest completely on their shoulders is insanity.
  Reply to this
  1. 5/13/2011 2:58 PM Bill wrote:
     I agree that it is possible, but I don't think it is probable. The CIA is not that tightly under the contol of liberals, most tend to be on the conservative side. The CIA has members who belong to at least a couple different political ideologies, so someone could have leaked the news of his death and likely would have. Also, after the initial attempts to deny his death, radical groups confirmed his death by the next week, in statements which praised his life and promised revenge. It would be in the terrorist's advantage to keep the idea of bin Laden's death a secret if they could, as it would keep the USA searching for him, wasting money and manpower. As said above, the truth usually comes out, especially when there are a lot of people involved in the matter. Besides, I don't see any advantage in keeping his previous death a secret; the only real advantage might be the imagined political purpose suggested in the article. And the CIA does not get involved in cover-ups for such reasons. It would be stupid for them to do so. They depend on Congress for funding, and it would not be wise to piss off half of Congress, or half of the USA (assuming that opinions regarding such activity would split according to political allegiance, and not be influenced by ordinate moral values, which I think is unlikely).
     I also recognize the problem in believing Obama; he has set new lows for honesty among politicians, which is really saying something. I doubt he was happy about having to kill Osama. *He is a persistently indecisive person; he normally has others come up with the plan, as he has done with virtually all the legislation he eventually signed into law. *He normally avoids taking actions which go against the radical muslims. 1- he is ideologically alligned with them in my opinion, and 2- he is scared of being seen as betraying them. *A WH insider reported that Valerie Jarrett, his longtime marxist friend from Chicago, advised him for months to hold off making a decision regarding the mission. On the other side, Hillary, Leon Panetta, and the Joint Chiefs advised him to go ahead with the mission. Obama wavered, never actually taking a position, instead "studying" the issue. Finally Leon Panetta (whose former boss Bill Clinton wasted opportunities to kill bin Laden) who had a team of SEALs which reported directly to him and only him, gave the go ahead. Then Obama was stuck with having to come forward to say that he had authorized the mission. I am sure he did not like having to say that. It meant that his radical muslim terrorist friends would see him as a traitor. It would be a fitting irony if he were attacked by his ideological counterparts in al qaeda.
     Reply to this
• 5/13/2011 12:12 PM Susn wrote:
  L O L....and Now everyone's getting it....d'oh
  Reply to this
• 5/13/2011 12:13 PM Suz wrote:
  L O L....and the bird on his shoulder makes me giggle.....
  Reply to this
• 5/15/2011 7:23 PM triker wrote:
  Hate to bust your bubble sonny! I have a very good friend that was involved with DET6 and that specific OP. Trust me OBL IS dead!
  Reply to this

Leave a comment