"Counting on the Constitution"
A fun way to learn the Constitution while coloring, completing mazes and dot to dots. Learn to count and write the numbers as you count. Improve your handwriting and learn the real meaning of the
Constitution. Published by 12 year old PATRIOT, Patrick Torma!
HUSTUSA says...get it NOW!!!
HUSTUSA recommends Corel...
HUSTUSA recommends Corel
for graphic and video effects,
just the way you want them!!!
To Mark Constitution Day, Congress Should Require All Bills to Cite Their Constitutional Authority
Posted by Kevin Boland on September 17, 2010
On this day in 1787, the Founding Fathers signed the U.S. Constitution -
and what better way to honor their legacy than to adopt a proposal by
Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ) to require each bill moving through Congress to
include a clause citing the specific constitutional authority upon
which the bill would be enacted. Last month, Rep. Shadegg submitted the
idea on America Speaking Out,
and it was immediately embraced by House Republican Leader John Boehner
(R-OH). To mark Constitution Day today, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
and the House Democratic leadership should honor the Constitution by
scheduling a vote on Rep. Shadegg’s proposal. POLITICO today reported on the concept:
"House
Republicans are planning to roll out their [governing] agenda over the
next two weeks as they seek to take back the House majority, prepping a
list of roughly 20 initiatives — including a few that seem driven by the
tea party movement.
"One of the GOP proposals would require
bills to have a specific citation of constitutional authority, on the
heels of criticism that Democrats breached their constitutional limits
in Congress with big-ticket bills like health care reform. If a member
questioned whether the House had constitutional authority to pass a
bill, that challenge would receive debate and a vote."
As Rep. Shadegg explains:
"For
too long, the federal government has operated without Constitutional
restraint, creating ineffective and costly programs and massive deficits
year after year. In the past eighteen months, this trend has gotten
alarmingly worse, and Congress continues to overstep its governing role
at the expense of American taxpayers.
"As Members of Congress,
we need to make sure that we are only spending when authorized to do
so. That is why every Congress since the 104th Congress I have
introduced the Enumerated Powers Act, H.R. 450 this Congress. This
measure would require that all bills introduced in the U.S. Congress
include a statement setting forth the specific constitutional authority
under which the law is being enacted. The Enumerated Powers Act will
force Congress to re-examine the role of the national government, and
will fundamentally alter the ever-expanding reach of the federal
government."
Rep. Shadegg’s proposed “Constitutional
clause” requirement sounds simple – and it is. But it could also be
surprisingly effective in creating an obstacle to expanded government.
Had the Shadegg reform been in effect months ago, for example, it would
have presented an interesting challenge for Democratic lawmakers trying
to pass President Obama’s massive health care takeover. The centerpiece
of ObamaCare is a constitutionally-suspect “individual mandate”
requiring every American citizen to purchase government-approved health
insurance. The mandate is under legal challenge in federal courts in
Florida and Virginia; more than 20 States are questioning its
Constitutional basis.
In an op-ed appearing this morning on National Review Online,
House Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) marks Constitution Day and
discusses the need for congressional reforms to defend the Constitution:
"It
is clear that we cannot rely just on the courts to uphold the
Constitution. Congress — and each of its members — must take seriously
its responsibility to legislate only within the few and defined powers
of the Constitution. But for that to occur, appeals to the Constitution
during legislative debate have to become more than just another
rhetorical tactic.
"My colleague John Shadegg of Arizona has
proposed that every bill include a section that cites the specific
constitutional authorization of the proposition. I commend John and
think we can even go a step further. When there is a question about a
bill’s constitutionality, we should set aside time during debate to
focus on that question first. We shouldn’t proceed with legislation
until we have resolved its constitutionality. Unlike our Supreme Court
nominees, all members should be on record as to where they stand on the
limits of congressional power."
5/3/2011 2:01 PMdaigoumee wrote:
My partner and I really enjoyed reading this blog post, I was just itching to know do you trade featured posts? I am always trying to find someone to make trades with and merely thought I would ask. Reply to this
5/3/2011 3:23 PM
HUSTUSA wrote:
Howdy Partners...well, you are welcome to send me your posts and I will post them if they are appropriate and timely...thanks for asking and i hope you continue to enjoy what you find here!!! HUSTUSA Reply to this
My partner and I really enjoyed reading this blog post, I was just itching to know do you trade featured posts? I am always trying to find someone to make trades with and merely thought I would ask.
Reply to this
Howdy Partners...well, you are welcome to send me your posts and I will post them if they are appropriate and timely...thanks for asking and i hope you continue to enjoy what you find here!!! HUSTUSA
Reply to this