August 20, 2009 | House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) | Permalink Middle-class families and small businesses across America are right to ask, “ Where are the jobs?” After all, the Administration promised that its trillion-dollar “ stimulus”
spending bill would provide a “jolt” to the economy and create jobs
immediately. However, more than two million jobs have been lost since
the “stimulus” became law, and the unemployment rate has risen far
beyond the eight percent promised by the Administration if Congress
passed the “stimulus.” Now, Washington Democrats are poised to pass
legislation that will destroy even more jobs: a costly government
takeover of health care that will impose new taxes and Big Government
mandates on small businesses and increase their health care costs as
well. House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) warns that this will
put even more Americans out of work: | “Middle-class
families and small businesses want bipartisan solutions that will
encourage more job creation at a time when too many Americans are out
of work. But Washington Democrats are prepared to go it alone in order
to pass a government takeover of health care that will drive up costs,
increase our deficits, and destroy countless small business jobs.
Republicans have offered better solutions to help small businesses
provide quality, affordable health care to their employees and their
families. Democrats would be well-served to scrap their costly
government-run plan and work with Republicans on bipartisan health care
reforms that the American people can support.” | Indeed,
a detailed analysis of the Democrats’ government takeover of health
care finds that small businesses and their employees don’t fare well
under the legislation. Here are just a few examples: - Page 155-157; Section 321–
This section imposes fines of $100 per employee per day on employers
who do not offer a level of health coverage that is
“government-approved” (employers would pay this fine every day until
the oversight is corrected). This means that fines of up to $500,000
can be imposed on employers who make an honest mistake, thinking they
had provided what the government deemed “sufficient” coverage.
- Page 189; Section 421 (b)(2) – Under
the bill, small businesses could receive subsidies to cover a portion
of their health care costs. However, to receive a full subsidy, the
average employee income must be below $20,000 and have fewer than 10
employees. This creates a perverse incentive to keep wages low and to
not hire new workers.
- Page 150; Section 313 – The
bill includes a “small business exclusion” from the eight percent
payroll tax, but the definition of small business in the bill leaves a
large number of small businesses subject to the full eight percent
tax. In fact, on average, small businesses with as few as 12 employees
would be subject to a new payroll tax through the bill if they could
not afford to provide coverage. Worse, the bill does not index to
inflation the amounts which trigger the “small business exemption”
meaning that Democrats have built into the bill a mechanism that
capture and subject more small employers to the eight percent tax over
time.
- Page 198; Section 441 – If the
government does not realize savings the authors of the bill claim will
occur – even though congressional scorekeepers did not project any
savings from these provisions – then the national small business surtax
is automatically increased.
- Pages 144-149; Section 312 –
The bill mandates that employer contributions cannot come through
salary reductions. Under this section, employers have to make a
minimum contribution toward the health benefits plan premium for both
full-time and less than full-time employees. By the terms of this
provision, they cannot take that contribution out of an employee’s
salary. That defies logic since any contribution that an employer
makes toward a health care premium is necessarily money it cannot pay
to its employees in salary. This will lead substantial layoffs as
employers face this de facto tax.
Small businesses are
the engine of our economy. Instead of punishing them with more taxes
and mandates, shouldn’t Washington be encouraging them to create more
jobs and provide their employees and their families access to more
affordable health care? |
Comments